Since Mr. Lawler and Mrs. Logan introduced our new unit about American identity and the search for one's self, I've given some thought to the dominant narrative of the North Shore, and how this affects individual's personal narratives.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Joe the Lawyer's Personal Identity
Since Mr. Lawler and Mrs. Logan introduced our new unit about American identity and the search for one's self, I've given some thought to the dominant narrative of the North Shore, and how this affects individual's personal narratives.
Monday, May 4, 2009
The Morality of NOT Going to War
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
A Spy, An Interpreter, and A Model: One Classy "Soldier"
Monday, April 13, 2009
Racial Outliers
After reading the excerpt in class of Malcolm Gladwell's: Outlier's-The Story of Success, I was so intrigued by his asterisk to America's dominant narrative of success that I decided read the book in its entirety. Along with his 10,000 hour rule and theory that arbitrary advantage and luck play as large of a role-if not larger-than innate talent in the equation of true success, Gladwell brings up many other fascinating points. However it is not until the end of the book that he truly brings his theories full circle.
In the book’s last chapter, readers gain an insight into Gladwell's family history and discover that the success of his relatives were not just of their own making, but depended on opportunity and legacy, on history and community. He ties the lives of his family as a foundational warrant to prove his final claim. However, what stood out to me the most out of this last chapter was not the remarkable power of opportunity and luck in the story of sucess, but something that connects back to our unit on agency and oppression.
Gladwell’s relatives lived on the island of Jamaica. In Jamaica, the plantation owners extracted the maximum possible effort from their human property while the property was still young. They worked the slaves until they were useless or dead, and then simply bought another round of slaves at the market. They had no problem with the philosophical contradiction of cherishing the children they had with a female slave, while simultaneously treating their slaves as property. Thus due to the inhumane treatment of dark skinned slaves, the lighter-skin classes-or brown skinned- blacks in Jamaica came to be regarded as worthier, for they were partly of white blood. Very stark divisions divided the dark skinned from the brown skinned. These divisions were most apparent within the family structure, which ultimately lay the foundation for the public manifestation of color prejudice: “the most lightly colored will be favored at the expense of the others…the darker members of the family will be kept out of the way when the friends of the fair or fairer members of the family are being entertained” (Gladwell 282).
In our agency and oppression unit, we talked in depth about the oppression of whites onto blacks and the agency between blacks. However, we did not talk about the existence of oppression within a single racial group. Rather than uniting and creating agency to empower their racial status, the blacks created further division within their own race by essentially segregating the darker skinned from the light skinned. Not only did this most likely delay their attainment of equal rights, but it also reflects an approval, rather than a defiance, for what the whites were doing. It sends the message that superficial divisions based on skin color are acceptable. Perhaps this is a commentary of what one will do to rise up the social ladder. Regardless of familial ties, friends, and the belief that “all men are created equal,” it appears that people will do whatever necessary to gain, or remain in power.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Are YOU in Good Hands?
In class a few weeks ago, we looked at advertisements and analyzed the appeals companies were selling along with their commodity. Ever since this exercise, I've become very conscious of how manipulative advertisements are, for along with their actual product, they sell what they know their viewers are hungry for. Often times this includes the appeals of popularity, success, beauty, and happiness. Considering the monumental impact our current economic recession is having on America, it only seems appropriate that advertisements are using this financial situation to gain pathos and logos in selling their products. While watching TV, I came across a specific AllState commercial that exemplifies how useful this tactic really is.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Redefining Wealth
As questions are raised as to whether our current economic situation will lead into a depression, and as we hear blurbs about the latest unemployment rate on the news, panic rises. This is the inevitable reaction of course, and a natural one considering how Americans characterize the American Dream, and thus happiness, as financial prosperity. Although we as a society like to convince ourselves that we are the exception to the rule, and do not link happiness with financial wealth, all too many are lying to themselves. Two economists from the University of Pennsylvania conducted a study where they concluded that the majority of people do indeed link money to happiness.
Monday, February 23, 2009
An Unfortunate Asterisk to the American Narrative
Monday, February 16, 2009
Melting Pot traded in for a Tossed Salad
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
"I Hate To Be Rude But..."
You've seen or heard them-those courageous, hopeful, and often tone death individuals who think they're the next American Idol. They dress up in ridiculous costumes, sing ear piercing renditions of Whitney Houston and attempt to be Simon Cowell's next BFF. They air on the most watched parts of the most popular reality show on television, American Idol's audition week.
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Three Cups of Tea::Three doses of agency
Deep in the Karakoram mountains, the inhabitants of an impoverished Pakistanian village were financially oppressed by the government. The leaders of Pakistan spent the money, which was meant to be spent on the education of the country's citizens, on bombs and other weapons. Without the means to build schools, buy supplies, or hire teachers, children were only able to have classes outside once a week. Trapped in a cycle of impoverishment and illiteracy, the inhabitants of the small village had little hope for their future.